Where do Venture Capitalists invest? Case of Latvia

Anita Matisone, Natalja Lace


The paper presents the study of Latvian Venture Capital (VC) funds’ investment trends in particular industries.

The literature analysis reveals five main factors influencing VC funds’ managers preferences towards particular industries: three external factors (existing clusters in the investment region; high growth industries; availability of other funding for companies from specific sectors) and two internal (factors driven by VC funds’ limited partners profile; possession of specific industry related knowledge). 

The results of the practical part of the study show that 52% of Latvian VC funds’ investments (total amount) went to Services sectors, 45% to Manufacturing and 3% to other industries. From the total amount invested in Services according to the classification of Eurostat, investments in High-tech knowledge-intensive sectors account for 46%, Knowledge-intensive services - for 10% and less knowledge-intensive sectors – for 44%. Breakdown of investments in Manufacturing is as follows: 26% in High-technology firms, 24% in Medium-high technology; 15% in Medium-low technology and 35% in Low technology. 

Investment patterns of different Latvian VC funds’ managers vary substantially. For example, investments in High-technology and High-tech knowledge-intensive sectors were made only by three of five Latvian fund managers. Other two invested heavily in Low Technology and Less knowledge-intensive sectors. Industry-related knowledge and experience accumulated in particular fund management team presumably is an explanation of the variances in the patterns.


Venture Capital, Public Policy, New Technology-Based Firms, Finance Escalator, Industries and Latvia

Full Text:



Andrieu, G., & Groh, A. P. (2012). Entrepreneurs' financing choice between independent and bank-affiliated venture capital firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(5), 1143-1167.

Andrieu, G., & Groh, A. P. (2018). Specialist versus generalist investors: Trading off support quality, investment horizon and control rights. European Economic Review, 101, 459-478.

Aulakh, S., & Thorpe, L. (2011). BIS Equity Finance Programmes Qualitative Reviews of: a) UKHTF and b) The Bridges Fund, Ekosgen report to the Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

Baeyens, K., Vanacker, T., & Manigart, S. (2006). Venture capitalists' selection process: the case of biotechnology proposals. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(1-2), 28-46.

Benson, D., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2009). Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organization Science, 20(2), 329-351.

Bertoni, F., D’Adda, D., & Grilli, L. (2016). Cherry-picking or frog-kissing? A theoretical analysis of how investors select entrepreneurial ventures in thin venture capital markets. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 391-405.

Butchart, R., 1987. A new UK definition of high-technology industries. Economic Rev. 400, 82–88.

Callagher, L. J., Smith, P., & Ruscoe, S. (2015). Government roles in venture capital development: a review of current literature. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4(3), 367-391.

Cassar, G., 2004. The financing of business start-ups. J. Bus. Ventur. 19 (2), 261–283.

Conti, A., Dass, N., Di Lorenzo, F., & Graham, S. J. (2019). Venture capital investment strategies under financing constraints: Evidence from the 2008 financial crisis. Research Policy, 48(3), 799-812.

Delapierre, M., Madeuf, B., & Savoy, A. (1998). NTBFs—the French case. Research Policy, 26(9), 989-1003.

European Commission - Fact Sheet, Brussels, 10 April 2018 http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-18-2764_en.htm

Gompers, P., Kovner, A., & Lerner, J. (2009). Specialization and success: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 817-844.

Green, M. B. (2004). Venture Capital Investment in the United States 1995-2002. Industrial Geographer, 2(1).

Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Research Policy, 43(9), 1523-1543.

Harris, R. S., Jenkinson, T., & Kaplan, S. N. (2014). Private equity performance: What do we know? The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1851-1882.

Karsai, J. (2018). Government venture capital in central and eastern Europe. Venture Capital, 20(1), 73-102.

Knockaert, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Wright, M. (2006). Do human capital and fund characteristics drive follow-up behaviour of early stage high-tech VCs?. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(1-2), 7-27.

Little, A. D. (1977), 'New Technology Based Firms in the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany', Wilton House, London.

MacMillan, I. C., Siegel, R., & Narasimha, P. S. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business venturing, 1(1), 119-128.

Martin, R., Berndt, C., Klagge, B., & Sunley, P. (2005). Spatial proximity effects and regional equity gaps in the venture capital market: evidence from Germany and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A, 37(7), 1207-1231.

Matisone, A., Lace, N. (2019) Entrepreneurs’ and Venture Capitalists’ openness for cooperation: barriers and drivers.

Patzelt, H., Zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D., & Arnoldt, I. (2006). How do venture capitalists spread risk by diversification within specialised life science portfolios?. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(1-2), 105-125.

Pavlova, E., & Signore, S. (2019). The European venture capital landscape: an EIF perspective.

Prencipe, D. (2017). The European venture capital landscape: an EIF perspective. Volume III: Liquidity events and returns of EIF-backed VC investments (No. 2017/41). EIF Working Paper.

Prohorovs, A. (2014). The Volume of Venture Capital Funds of Latvia and Their Financing Sources. Journal of China-USA Business Review, 13(4), 217-234.

Prohorovs, A., & Jakusonoka, I. (2012). Financing of innovation system development and attraction of private capital. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference" Economic Science for Rural Development (No. 28, pp. 219-224).

Prohorovs, A., Bistrova, J., & Ten, D. (2019). Startup Success Factors in the Capital Attraction Stage: Founders’ Perspective. Journal of East-West Business, 25(1), 26-51.

Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (2001). The venture capitalist-entrepreneur relationship: control, trust and confidence in co-operative behaviour. Venture Capital: an international journal of entrepreneurial finance, 3(2), 129-149.

Storey, D. J., & Tether, B. S. (1996). A review of the empirical knowledge and an assessment of statistical data on the economic importance of new technology based firms (NTBFs) in Europe European Commission, Directorate General XIII, the Innovation Programme.

The role of venture capital for economic growth in the Nordic Region, Stocholm Economics, February 2019.

Wishlade, F., Michie, R., Familiari, G., Schneiderwind, P., & Resch, A. (2015). Ex-Post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes 2007-13, Focusing on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund (CF): Work Package 3: Financial Instruments for Enterprise Support-Draft Final Report.

Zider, B. (1998). How venture capital works. Harvard business review, 76(6), 131-139.

zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D., & Kind, S. (2006). M&A and diversification strategies of VC-backed firms in the biotechnology industry. Venture Capital and the Changing World of Entrepreneurship, 5, 199.

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.13165/IE-19-13-1-02


  • There are currently no refbacks.

"Intellectual Economics" ISSN online 1822-8038 / ISSN print 1822-8011