The Essence and Structure of Metagovernance

Alvydas Raipa

Abstract


Over the last decades of the 20th and the start of the 21st century, the main features of changes in public administration have involved the evolution of traditional forms of such administration into postmodern public governance systems.
This paper examines the evolution of public governance theory and practice. The underlying research question is: what is metagovernance and what structure does it take (in terms of the governance of governance)? To answer this, the article uses meta-analysis, theoretical modelling, comparative analysis, and interpretative and prognostic methods as a basis to evaluate many definitions of new public governance. The description of the development of metagovernance connects and combines the line of new forms and doctrines of public governance as good, smart governance, post new public management and new public services. All these theoretical definitions and models of new forms of transformation of governance can be characterised as forms, subsystems or elements of basic metagovernance systems. The term “metagovernance” encompasses the complexity of modern governance and suggests including hierarchies, market and network forms of governance. Metagovernance can be defined as a mutual, hybrid form of three ideal types of governance in the 21st century. The concept combines the best features of theory and governance practice from traditional public administration, new public management and postmodern forms of new public governance.

Keywords


metagovernance, hierarchical governance, market governance, network governance, new public management, new public governance.

Full Text:

PDF (Lithuanian)

References


Akintoje, A., Beck, M. Management and Finanse of Public - Private Partnership. Chishester; Willey – Blackwell. 2009.

Alford, J., Hughes, O. Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. American Review of Public Administration 38(2) (2008): 130-148.

Banelienė, R. Euras Lietuvoje: matavimo pokyčiai ir galimos jų pasekmės. Viešasis Administravimas 2(42) (2014): 38 -39.

Bourgon, J. The History and Future of Nation Building: Building Capacity for Public Results. International Review of Administrative Sciences 76(2) (2010): 203-220.

Bublienė, D. Vartojimo sutarčių nesąžiningų sąlygų kontrolė. Vilnius: Registrų centras. 2009.

Chinkota, M., Pinkwart, A. International Bussines Research in the New Role of Ministeries ( there is sunshine above the clouds). Thunderbird International Bussines Review 54(2) (2012): 253 -261.

Christensen, T. Post NPM and Changing Public Governance. Journal of Political Science and Economics 1 (2012): 1-11.

Denhardt, J., Denhardt, R. The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review 60(6) (2000): 549-559.

Ergun, M. Governance as a New Paradigm – the Decade of 2010. In: Dviwedi, O. (ed). Public Administration in a Global Context. IASIA AT 50. Bruxselles: Brulyant, 2011: 131 -132.

Ferlie, E. Complex Organizations and Contemporary Public Sector Organizations. International Public Administration Review Journal 10(2) (2007): 153-165.

Jaspers, K. Smysl i naznačenije istoriji. Moskva: Respublika, 1994.

Kamensky, J. The Next New Thing in Performance Management. PA Times 34(5) (2011): 6-14.

Kostadinova,T.,Neshkova, M. Explaining the Incidence of Administrative Reform in Eastern Europe. In: Vintar, M., Rosenbaum, A., Jenei, G., Drechler, W (Eds.). The Past, Present and Future of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee, 2013: 91-107.

Laegreid, P., Verchoest, K. Governance and Public Sector Modernization. London: Palgrave Mc Millan, 2010.

Lane, J. State Management. London: Routledge, 2009.

Lobanova, L. Socialiai orientuota rinkos ekonomika Europs Sąjungoje ir iššūkiai žmogiškųjų išteklių vadybos tobulinimui. Viešasis administravimas 2(42) (2014): 53-63.

Luke, B., Verreynne, M., Kearins, K. Innovative and Entrpreneurial Activity in the Public Sector: The Changing Face of Public Sector Institutions. Innovation, Management, Policy and Practice 12 (2010): 138-153.

McNabb, D. The New Face of Government. New York: CRC Press, 2009.

Melian – Gonsales, A., Batista – Karino., Sanches - Madina, A. Identifying and Assesing Resources and Core Capabilities in Public Organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(1) (2010): 98-99.

Meuleman, L. Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Market. Leipcig: Springer, 2008.

Mikkelsen, M. Policy Network Analysis and Strategic Tool for Voluntary Sector. Policy Studies 27(1) (2010): 17-26.

Moliterno, T., Mahony, D. Network Theory of Organization: A Multilevel Approach. Journal of Management 37(2) (2011): 442-467.

Osborne, P., Brown, L. Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK: The Word That Would Be King? Public Administration 89(4) (2011); 1335-1350.

Overem, P. The Politics – Administration Dichotomy. New York: CRC Press, 2012.

Perry, J., Buckwalter, N. The Public Service of the Future. Public Administration Review 70(1) (2010): 238-245.

Peters B Guy., Erkkila, T., Maravič, P. Public Administration. Research Strategies, Concepts and Methods. New York: Routledge, 2016.

Peters B Guy. Governance and Public Bureaucracy: New Forms of Democracy or New Forms of Control ? Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 26 (2004): 3-16.

Peters B Guy. Metagovernance and Public Management. In: St. Osborne (ed). The New Public Governance. London: Routledge, 2010: 37-41, 44-47.

Raipa, A. Naujojo viešojo valdymo dekompozicijos analizė. Kn: A. Raipa ir kiti. Modernus viešasis valdymas. Kaunas: Vitae litera, 2012: 245-261.

Raipa, A. Tarpsektorinės sąveikos pokyčiai: iššūkiai viešojo valdymo teorijai. Viešasis administravimas 2(42) (2014): 8-18.

Raipa, A. Viešojo valdymo reformų tendencijos ir perspektyvos. Kn: Raipa, A.,Smalskys, V., Giedraitytė,V., Nefas, S. Šiuolaikinio viešojo administravimo pagrindai. Vilnius: Registrų centras. 2016: 180-181.

Raipa, A. Viešosios vertės kūrimas naujojo viešojo valdymo struktūroje. Viešoji politika ir administravimas 15(20) (2016): 220-234.

Sorenson, E. Metagovernance:The Changing Role of Politicians in Process of Democratic Governance. The Americian Review of Public Administration 36 (2006): 98-124.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13165/VPA-16-15-4-01

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603