Investigation into Key Elements of Transparent Lobbying

Šárka Laboutková, Petr Vymetal

Abstract


Lobbying is a legitimate way of interest representation in democracy. Although the number of countries introducing rules on lobbying activity is increasing, there are many doubts about the efficiency of measures introduced in terms of nontransparent lobbying activities and unfair forms of influence. The paper investigates the main approaches, elements and measures recommended and implemented by countries and international organizations in order to increase the transparency of lobbying practice in the decision-making process and proposes a basic set (catalogue) of key measures. It argues that a complex approach combining lobbying rules and many other supportive and linked measures is needed in order to extend transparent lobbying and decision-making. The article contributes to the discussion on the main theoretical issues and problems that arise in terms of transparent lobbying and proposes a catalogue of basic measures necessary to evaluate the transparency of lobbying in a broader and more detailed way in future research.

Keywords


lobbying; transparency; rules

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gerber, E.R. Legislatures, initiatives, and representation: the effects of state legislative institutions on policy. Political Research Quarterly, 1996, Vol. 49, No 2 (June), 263–286.

Burson-Marsteller. Effective Lobbying In Europe. Brussels, 2013. http://lobbyingsurvey.burson-marsteller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/european_lobbying_survey_2013.pdf [2016-06-15].

Statista: Total lobbying spending in the United States from 1998 to 2016 https://www.statista.com/statistics/257337/total-lobbying-spending-in-the-us/ [2016-11-22].

CRP: Lobbying Database. Washington: Centre for Responsive Politics, 2016. http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/ [2016-11-22].

Chari, R., Hogan, J. and Murphy, G. Regulating lobbying: a global comparison. Manchester Univ. Press, 2012.

Chari, R. and Murphy, G. Examining and Assessing the Regulation of Lobbyists in Canada, the USA, the EU institutions, and Germany: A Report for the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. 1st ed. Dublin: Trinity College, 2006. http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/LocalGovernment/Administration/FileDownLoad,14572,en.pdf [cit. 2009-11-16].

Laboutková, Š. and Vymětal, P. Transparentnost a regulace v lobbingu [Transparency and lobbying regulation]. Scientia et Societas, 2011, Vol. VII, No 3, 79–94.

TI. Lobbying in Europe: hidden influence, privileged access. Berlin: Transparency International, 2015. http://files.transparency.org/content/download/1909/12646/file/2015_LobbyingInEurope_EN.pdf [cit. 2016-09-28].

Friedman, D.D. Does Altruism Produce Efficient Outcomes? Marshall versus Kaldor. The Journal of Legal Studies, 1988 (Jan.) Vol. 17, No 1, 1-13.

Schnackenberg, A. Measuring Transparency: Towards a Greater Understanding of Systemic Transparence and Accountability. Case Western Reserve University WP-09-02. https://weatherhead.case.edu/departments/organizational-behavior/workingPapers/WP-09-02.pdf [cit. 2016-05-28].

Forssbaeck, J. and Oxelheim, L. The Oxford Handbook of Economic and Institutional Transparency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Bloomfield, R. and O'Hara, M. Market Transparency: Who Wins and Who Loses? The Review of Financial Studies, 1999, Vol. 12, No 1, 5–35.

Madhavan, A., Porter, D. and Weaver, D. Should securities markets be transparent? Journal of Financial Markets, 2005, Vol. 8, No 3, 265–287.

Pagano, M. and Röell, A. Transparency and Liquidity: A Comparison of Auction and Dealer Markets with Informed Trading. The Journal of Finance, 1996 (June), Vol. LI, No 2, 579–611.

Securities and Exchange Commission Market 2000: An examination of current equity Market Developments. Washington D.C.: SEC, Division of Market Regulation, 1995.

Securities and Investment Board. Regulation of the United Kingdom Equity Markets. London: SIB, 1995.

Bushman, R.M., Piotroski, J.D. and Smith, A.J. What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 2004, Vol. 42, No 2, 207–252.

Jordan, J., Peek, J., & Rosengren, E. 2000. The Market Reaction to the Disclosure of Supervisory Actions: Implications for Bank Transparency. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2000, Vol. 9, No 3, 298–319.

Winkler, B. Which Kind of Transparency? On the Need for Clarity in Monetary Policymaking. European Central Bank Working paper No. 26, 2000. http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp026.pdf [2016-05-28].

Flood, M., Huisman, R., Koedijk, K. and Mahieu, R. Quote disclosure and price discovery in multiple-dealer financial markets. Review of Financial Studies, 1999, Vol. 12, No 1, 37–59.

Granados, N., Gupta, A. and Kauffman, R. The impact of IT on market information and transparency: a unified theoretical framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2006, Vol. 7, No 3, 148–178.

Churchwell, C. Corporate Transparency Improves for Foreign Firms in US Markets. Harvard Business School Working Knowledge Series, 2003. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3489.htmlhttp://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/3489.html [2016-05-28].

Jetzek, T., Avital, M. and Bjørn-Andersen, N. Generating Value from Open Government Data. In: R Baskerville & M Chau (eds.). Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2013. Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Atlanta, GA.

Miller, G.J. and Moe, M.T. The positive Theory Of Hierarchies. In: Herbert F. Weisberg (ed.) Political Science: The Science of Politics. 1st ed. New York, Agathon Press, 1986.

Cohen-Eliya, M. and Hammer, Y. Nontransparent Lobbying as a Democratic Failure. William & Mary Policy Review, 2011, Vol. 2, 265–287. https://www.wm.edu/as/publicpolicy/wm_policy_review/Archives/Volume%202/NontransparentLobbying-MosheCohenEliyaandYoavHammer.pdf [2016-05-28].

Feld, L.P. and G. Kirchgässner. Direct democracy, political culture and the outcome of economic policy: A report on the Swiss experience. European Journal of Political Economy, 2000, Vol. 16, No 2, 287–306.

Marshall, A. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. 1946.

Isaak, A.C. (ed.). Scope and methods of political science: an introduction to the methodology of political inquiry. 4th ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1997.

Riker, W.H. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1962.

Říchová, B. Přehled moderních politologických teorií: [empiricko-analytický přístup v soudobé politické vědě]. Praha: Portál, 2000.

Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O. Theory of games and economic behavior. 60th anniversary ed. Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Owen, G. Game theory. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995.

Nash, J. Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, 1951, Vol. 54, No 2: 286–295.

Poundstone, W. Prisoner's dilemma. New York: Anchor Books, 1993.

Müller, K.B., Laboutková, Š., Vymětal, P. Lobbing v moderních demokraciích. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2010.

North, D.C. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

OECD. Modernising Government: The Way Forward. Paris: OECD, 2005.

Davies, T. Open data, democracy and public sector reform [online]. 2010. http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/2010/additional-transforming-research-through-open-data/ [2015-04-01].

Laboutková, Š. Open Government Data - A Lesson to Be Learned. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum 2015. 1th ed. Liberec: Technical University of Liberec, 2015: 78–88.

Yu, H., Robinson, D. The New Ambiguity of Open Government. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 2012, No 178: 180–208. http://www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/discourse/59-11.pdf [2016-06-04].

Laboutková, Š. Open Government Partnership: Unutilized Potential? (Case of the Czech Republic). Forthcoming 2017

Gilardi, F. Principal-Agent Models Go to Europe: Independent Regulatory Agencies as Ultimate Step of Delegation. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Canterbury (UK), 6-8 September 2001. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.202.2258&rep=rep1&type=pdf [2016-05-26].

Moe, T.M. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 1984, Vol. 28, No 4: 739–777.

Shapiro, S.P. Agency Theory. Annual Revue of Sociology, 2005, Vol. 31: 263–290. s. 268.

Kiewiet, D.R., McCubbins, M.D. The Logic of Delegation. Congressional Parties and the Appropriation Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

AIE. Lobbying Transparency via the Right to Information. Access Info Europe, 2015 https://www.access-info.org/wp-content/uploads/Lobby_Transparency_via_RTI_26_June_2015.pdf [2016-09-30].

AIE et al. The International Standards for Lobbying Regulation. Access Info Europe, Open Knowledge, Sunlight Foundation, Transparency International, 2015 http://lobbyingtransparency.net/lobbyingtransparency.pdf [2016-09-30].

OECD. The 10 Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying. Paris: OECD, 2010 (updated 2013) http://www.oecd.org/corruption/ethics/Lobbying-Brochure.pdf [2016-10-01].

TI. Lobbying in Europe: hidden influence, privileged access. Berlin: Transparency International, 2015 http://files.transparency.org/content/download/1909/12646/file/2015_LobbyingInEurope_EN.pdf [2016-09-30].

Vargovčíková, J. Variace diskursivního pojetí lobbingu v České republice a implikace pro jeho regulaci, Politologická revue, 2011, Vol. 2, No 2: 75–98.

Kalnins, V. Parliamentary Lobbying between Civil Rights and Corruption: An insight into lobbying practices in Latvia and recommendations for the Saeima. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Centre for Public Policy PROVIDIUS, 2005. http://www.politika.lv/index.php?f=249 [2016-05-31].

Griffith, G. The Regulation of Lobbying. Sydney: NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service, 2008 Briefing paper, No. 5. http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/publications.nsf/key/TheRegulationofLobbying/$File/The+regulation+of+lobbying+No+5-2008+and+index.pdf [2009-07-03].

TI UK. Open Governance Scorecard Methodology. London: Transparency International UK, 2015. http://www.transparency.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/download-attachments/includes/download.php?id=1492 [2016-09-12].

OGD: The 8 Principles of Open Government Data (OpenGovData.org). Available on https://opengovdata.org/ [cit. 2016-10-01].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-18-17-2-01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603