Simulation of Sustainable Farming Practices Development in Lithuania

Aistė Galnaitytė, Irena Kriščiukaitienė

Abstract


Sustainable development of the agricultural sector, for which the successful implementation of the policy is important, is an integral part of the quantitative assessment of the potential impact of the newly implemented agri-environmental measures on the agricultural sector. The article deals with the problem of the conflict between the coordination of private economic and public political interests to contribute to sustainable farming. The aim of the research is to identify and assess the impact of the most important agrienvironmental measures on structural, environmental, economic and social developments in the agricultural sector. A modeled scenario analysis and assessment was carried out using a mathematical programming model.

Keywords


sustainable farming practices, organic farming, integrated farming, mathematical programming, simulation, scenario analysis.

Full Text:

PDF (Lithuanian)

References


Agriculture and Food Sector Review. 1995. World Bank, Natural Resources Management Division, Country Department IV Europe and Central Asia Region, Report No. 13111-LT, Volume II: Subsectoral Analyses. 138 p.

Arovuori, K. 2008. Controversies between stated agricultural policy objectives and policy measures in the EU’s CAP. 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists–EAAE.

Balana, B. B., Vinten, A., Slee, B. 2011. A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: Key issues, methods, and applications, Ecological Economics 70(6): 1021–1031.

Bendra Lietuvos kaimo plėtros 2007–2013 m. programos priemonių statistika. Nacionalinė mokėjimo agentūra prie Žemės ūkio ministerijos. 2015. https://www.nma.lt/index.php/parama/lietuvos-kaimo-pletros-20072013-m-programa/statistika/4618 [2017 01 16].

Bertoni, D., Olper, A. 2012. The political economy of agri-environmental measures: An empirical assessment at the eu regional level, APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 6(3–4): 71–82.

De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., Boumans, R. M. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, Ecological economics 41(3): 393–408.

Diakosavvas, D. 2003. The greening of the WTO green box: A quantitative appraisal of agri-environmental policies in OECD countries. Proceedings of the International Conference–Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO: Where are we Heading: 23–26.

Europos Komisija [interaktyvus]. 2014. Apie Europos Sąjungos politiką. Žemės ūkis Prieiga per internetą: http://europa.eu/pol/pdf/flipbook/lt/agriculture_lt.pdf [2017 01 19].

Giupponi, C., Azzellino, A., Salvetti, R., Parati, P., Carpani, M. 2012. Water quality assessment in the venice lagoon watershed with multiple modelling approaches, Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Pathways and Visions Under Uncertainty.International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Leipzig, Germany: 1327–1334.

Gómez-Baggethun, E., De Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., Montes, C. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological economics 69(6): 1209–1218.

Gorton, M., Davidova, S. 2004. Farm productivity and efficiency in the CEE applicant countries: a synthesis of results, Agricultural economics 30(1): 1–16.

Hazel, P. B. R., Norton,R. D. 1986. Mathematical programming for economics analysis in agriculture. New York: Macmillan. 402 p.

Informacija apie 2012 metais Lietuvoje deklaruotas žemės ūkio naudmenas ir kitus plotus. 2012. Vilnius: VĮ ŽŪIKVC. 119 p.

Informacija apie 2013 metais Lietuvoje deklaruotas žemės ūkio naudmenas ir kitus plotus. 2013. Vilnius: VĮ ŽŪIKVC. 124 p.

Juvancic, L., Travnikar, T., Glavan, M., Cvejic, R., Pintar, M. 2012. Targeting and Spatial Impacts of Agri–Environmental Support – Spatial Econometric Analysis of Agri–Environmental Measures in Slovenia, 132 nd Seminar, October 25–27, 2012, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia 139491. European Association of Agricultural Economists.

Kaimas lūžio metais: Lietuvos žemdirbių sąjūdžio idėjų ir veiksmų dvidešimtmetis. Medžiaga agrarinės pertvarkos istorijai. 2008. Autorių kolektyvas: Treinys, M. – sudarytojas…[et. al.]. Akademija: VšĮ „Spalvų kraitė“. 472 p.

Kirchmann, H., Bergstrom, L. 2008. Organic crop production: Ambitions and limitations. Springer. 244 p.

Kriščiukaitienė, I., Tamošaitienė, A., Andrikienė, S. 2006. Ūkio veiklos modeliavimas ieškant pelningiausių sprendimų, Žemės ūkio mokslai 1(Priedas): 35–47.

Latacz‐Lohmann, U., Hodge, I. 2003. European agri‐environmental policy for the 21st century, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47(1): 123–139.

Lietuvos kaimo plėtros 2007–2013 metų programa. Konsoliduota 2014 12 22 versija. 2007. http://zum.lrv.lt/uploads/zum/documents/files/LT_versija/Veiklos_sritys/Kaimo_pletra/Lietuvos_kaimo_pletros_2007%E2%80%932013%20m._programa/KPP20072013LT20141222.pdf [2017 01214].

Lietuvos žemės ūkio plėtros strategijos įgyvendinimo programos. 2002. Autorių kolektyvas: Stanikūnas, D. – vadovas…[et al.]. Vilnius: Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutas. 720 p.

Mierauskas, P. 2011. Biologinei įvairovei palankaus ūkininkavimo kai kurie socialiniai ekonominiai aspektai, Darnaus vystymosi strategija ir praktika: mokslo darbai 1(5): 104–113.

Mouysset, L., Doyen, L., Jiguet, F., Allaire, G., Leger, F. 2011. Bio economic modeling for a sustainable management of biodiversity in agricultural lands, Ecological Economics 70(4): 617–626.

Posner, J. L., Baldock, J. O., Hedtcke, J. L. 2008. Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: I. Productivity 1990–2002, Agronomy Journal 100(2): 253–260.

Solovyeva, I., Nuppenau, E. 2012. Improving measures for targeting agri-environmental payments: The case of high nature value farming, 126th Seminar, June 27–29, 2012, Capri, Italy. European Association of Agricultural Economists.

Viaggi, D., Finn, J. A., Kurz, I., Bartolini, F. 2011. Multi-criteria analysis for environmental assessment of agri-environment schemes: How to use partial information from mid-term evaluations? Agricultural Economics Review 12(1): 5–21.

Vitunskienė, V., Vinciūnienė, V. 2014. Viešosios paramos reikšmė siekiant aplinkos darnumo Lietuvos žemės ūkyje. Štreimikienė, D. et al. (Eds.), Darnus vystymasis: Teorija ir praktika. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas. 252–281 p.

Vojtech, V. 2010. Policy measures addressing agri-environmental issues. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers No. 24. Paris: OECD Publishing. 42 p.

Westman, W. E. 1977. How much are nature's services worth? Science 197: 960–964.

Žemės ūkio ekonominių santykių valstybinio reguliavimo įstatymas. 1994 m. gruodžio 22 d. Nr. I-734.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13165/VPA-17-16-2-07

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603