The challenges of e-voting

Akos Cserny, Andras Nemeslaki

Abstract


In our paper we present a research framework, how the concept of evoting, as a complex info-communication technology innovation can potentially create social trust on an institutional level and political cohesion on a national level. In the centre of our argument will be the observation that the fluid borders between citizenship and nationality combined with mobility of inhabitants increase the demand for innovative voting solution supporting national elections. Also by developing this multifaceted research agenda we may find useful theoretical contribution to the field of e-democracy in general.

Keywords


E-Voting, E-Democracy, E-Government, Information and Communications Technology (ICT), Hungary, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)

Full Text:

PDF

References


- Aranyossy, M., Fekó, A., & Nemeslaki, A. (2014). The Quest for Success of e-Government: What Structure and Allocation of IT Spending Tells Us. 22nd. Annual NISPAcee Conference, (p.: 1-13). Budapest, May 22-24.

- Avgerou, C. (2013). Explaining Trust in IT-Mediated Elections: A Case Study of E-Voting in Brazil. Journal of the Association for Information Systems , 14 (8), 420-451.

- Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. Information Polity , 17 (3-4), 211-226.

- Bannister, F., & Remenyi, D. (2003). The Societal Value of ICT - First Steps Towards an Evaluation Framework. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation , 6 (2), 197-206.

- Brynjolfsson, E., & Saunders, A. (2010). Wired for Innovation: How Information Technology is Reshaping the Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

- Cserny, Á. (2014): Thoughts on issues of foreign citizens in the exercise of voting rights. (in Hungarian) In: Cserny, Á. (ed.): Boundless elections. Studies the election of the topic of citizens living abroad. National University of Public Servise. Election Systems Research Workshop. Budapest. 27-39.

- Eurobarometer. (2013). One Year To Go To The 2014 European Elections: Analytical Overview (EB/EP 79.5). Brussels: Directorate-General for Communication, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit.

- European Commission. (2013). Public Services Online ‘Digital by default, or by Detour?’ Assessing User Centric eGovernment performance in Europe – 2012 Benchmark. Luxemoburg: Publications Office of the European Union.

- Freeman, J., & Quirke, S. (2013). Is E--democracy a Myth Civic Participation and Democratic Reform. In P. Praycek, & N. Edelmann, CEDEM 13: Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (2nd edition.). Austria: Danube Krems University. 31-43.

- Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens´s structuration theory and information system research. MIS Quarterly , 32 (1), 127-157.

- Jones, M., Orlikowski, W., & Munir, K. (2004). Structuration Theory and Information Systems: A Critical Reappraisal. In J. Mingers, & L. Willcocks, Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. 297-328.

- Krasznay, C., & Török, S. (2014). Hungary’s Cyber Defense Readiness from the Perspective of International Recommendations. Hadmérnök (Military Engineering) (1), 209-216.

- Lee, A. (2004). Thinking about Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. In J. Mingers, & L. Willcocks, Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. 1-26.

- Lips, M. (2012). E-Government is dead: Long live Public Administration 2.0. Information Polity , 17 (3-4), 239-250.

- Mulder, B., & Hartog, M. (2013). Applied E-democracy - A need for an information framework to support development. In P. Praycek, & N. Edelmann, CEDEM 13: Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (2nd edition.) Austria: Danube Krems University. 19-30.

- Netanjahu, B. (1995). Harc a terrorizmus ellen (Fight Against Terrorism). Budapest: Alexandra Publisher.

- Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science , 3 (3), 398-427.

- Prosser, A., & Krimmer, R. (2004). The dimensions of electronic voting. In A. Prosser, & R. Krimmer, Electronic Voting in Europe – Technology, Law, Politics and Society. Austria, Germany, Switzerland: GI and OCG. 21-28.

- STOA. (2011). Can e-Voting Increase Electoral Participation? Brussels: STOA Workshop at the European Parlament 2011. March 17.

- Svensson, J., & Leenes, R. (2003). E-voting in Europe: Divergent democratic practice. Information Polity , 8 (1/2), 3-15.

- Szádeczky, T. (2014). Information Security - Strategy, codification and awareness. In A. Nemeslaki, ICT Driven Public Service Innovation. Budapest: Publisher of the National University of Public Service. 99-112.

- Székely, L. (2013). Hungarian Youth 2012 - Research Report (in Hungarian). Budapest: Kutatópont.

- Tiefenbrun, S. (2002). A semiotic approach to a legal definition of terrorism. ILSA J. Int'l & Comp (L), 371.

- UNPAN. (2014). United Nations E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future we Want. New-York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

- Vlachokyriakos, V., Dunphy, P., Taylor, N., Comber, R., & Olivier, P. (2013). Unpicking the desing space of e-voting for Participation. In P. Praycek, & N. Edelmann, CEDEM 13: Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (2nd edition) Austria: Danube Krems University. 357-362.

- Zubor, A. (2008). Advanced Voting Technologies - An International Outlook (in Hungarian). In A. Zubor (Szerk.). Summary of the Conference: "Advanced Voting Technologies 2007 - Present and Future, Budapest 2007. Nov. 14-15. Budapest: Secretary of Local Government and Regional Development.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-18-17-4-01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603