Lithuanian local action groups: spatial initiatives or mobilized potential for rural development?

Rita Vilkė, Ligita Šarkutė

Abstract


The new paradigm of innovative, sustainable and inclusive rural development calls for the search of new forms and approaches that might be applicable to explain the on-going transformations in the knowledge age. New rural policy stresses the focus on bottom-up approach, self-organization and cooperation between territorial government and local community. This highlights the need to align innovative approaches with available policy instruments to accelerate rural development. Currently rural development initiators might vitalize their innovative ideas and mobilize followers by accessing the EU support scheme using LEADER programme through local action groups (LAGs). However, the geographical distribution and activeness of Lithuanian LAGs vary from region to region in terms of activeness and absorption of EU support and there are reasons behind. This study aims to explain the role of local action groups in innovative bottom-up rural development from a new social movement theory approach. It is argued in the study that LAGs hold a potential to drive innovative rural development in a form of a new social movement, which might specifically emerge in particular field due to the idea proposed by particular local community actors and their ability to mobilize resources. Finally, this study proposes insights for scientific discussion regarding the possibility to explain the reasons of LAGs disparities in the absorption of EU support from a new social movement approach.

Keywords


rural development, new social movements, innovative initiatives, „bottom- up“ approach, local action groups (LAGs).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, T. (2017). Beyond the Participatory Development: Pathways Forward to Sustainable Rural Development. Social Transformations: Journal of the Global South, 3-30.

Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217-235.

Buechler, S. M. (1995). New social movement theories. Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441-464.

Buller, Henry, and Keith Hoggart. Agricultural Transformation, Food and Environment: Perspectives on European Rural Policy and Planning-Volume 1. Routledge, 2017.

Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons.

Christiansen, J. (2009). Four stages of social movements. EBSCO Research Starters, 1-7.

Crozat, M., Hipsher, P. L., Katzenstein, M. F., Keck, M. E., Klandermans, B., Kubik, J. & Reiter, H. (1997). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Deere, C. D., & Royce, F. S. (2009). Rural social movements in Latin America: Organizing for sustainable livelihoods. University Press of Florida.

Factsheet on 2014-2020 Rural Development Programme for Lithuania, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-2014-2020/country-files/lt/factsheet_en.pdf

Freeman, R. E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Fung, A. Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review 75(4) (2015): 513-522.

Guidance on Community-Led Local Development for Local Actors, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/2014/guidance_clld_local_actors.pdf

Hanspeter, K., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. G. (2015). New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Routledge.

Hart, R.A. Children's participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. Routledge, 2013.

Hoffmann, R. and Hoffmann, N. The Leader Programme as an Impulse for New Projects in Rural Areas. Quaestiones Geographicae 37.2 (2018): 141-150.

Ife, J. Community development in an uncertain world. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Inglehart, R. (1990). „Values, Ideology and Cognitive Mobilization in New Social Movements (pp. 43-66). Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.

Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual review of sociology, 9(1), 527-553.

Kas yra LEADER? Portal of Lithuanian LEADER. http://www.leaderlietuva.lt/lt/leader-lietuvoje/leader-2014-2020.html

Laraña, E., Gusfield, J. R., & Johnston, H. (Eds.). (2009). New social movements: From ideology to identity. Temple University Press.

LEADER 2007-2013 implementation update (2015). Leader/CLLD subgroup meeting Brussels, 21 April 2015. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/uploaded-files/leader1_kjasinska.pdf

LEADER APPROACH – Basic guide https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/publi/fact/leader/2006_en.pdf

Lietuvos kaimo plėtros 2014-2020 m. plėtros programa. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-2014-2020/country-files/lt/fulltext_lt.pdf

Lietuvos kaimo plėtros 2014–2020 m. programos įgyvendinimo statistika 2018. Nacionalinė mokėjimo agentūra prie Žemės ūkio ministerijos. https://www.nma.lt/index.php/parama/lietuvos-kaimo-pletros-20142020-m-programa/statistika/9156#res

Little, Jo. New rural governance? Progress in Human Geography, 2001, 25.1: 97-102.

Lofland, J. (2017). Social movement organizations: Guide to research on insurgent realities. Routledge.

Melucci, A. (1980). The new social movements: A theoretical approach. Information (International Social Science Council), 19(2), 199-226.

National Paying Agency under the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania, https://www.nma.lt/uploads/files/dir1064/dir53/dir2/0_0.php.

Obach, B.K., Tobin, K. Civic agriculture and community engagement. Agriculture and Human Values 31(2) (2014): 307-322.

Osborne, S.P., ed. The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge, 2010.

Patapas, A., Raipa, A., Smalskys, V. New Public Governance: The Tracks of Changes. International Journal of Business and Social Research 4(5) (2014): 25-32.

Ray, Ch. Culture economies. Centre for Rural Economy, Newcastle (2001).

Roggeband, C., & Klandermans, B. (2017). Displinary Approaches to Social Movement s. Introduction to Second Expanded and Updated Edition. In Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines (pp. 1-7). Springer, Cham.

Rosset, P. M., & Martínez-Torres, M. E. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: context, theory, and process. Ecology and society, 17(3).

Šumylė, D., Pareigienė, L., Ribašauskienė, E. (2018). Naujųjų socialinių judėjimų identifikavimas Lietuvoje: vietos maisto atvejis. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 17 (2), pp. ??

Székely, Vladimír. Rural development and local action groups in Slovakia: international and intranational comparisons. Acta Geobalcanica 4.1 (2018): 33-39.

The Lithuanian Department of Statistics; authors’ calculations.

Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2015). Social Movements 1768-2012. Routledge.

Touraine, A. (1971). The post-industrial society: tomorrow's social history: classes, conflicts and culture in the programmed society (Vol. 6813). Random House.

Waddock, S. (2017). The difference makers: How social and institutional entrepreneurs created the corporate responsibility movement. Routledge.

Warburton, D.. Community and sustainable development: participation in the future. Routledge, 2013.

Wieviorka, M. (2005). After new social movements. Social movement studies, 4(1), 1-19.

Woods, M. Deconstructing rural protest: the emergence of a new social movement. Journal of rural studies 19.3 (2003): 309-325.

Yang, A., et al. The use of spatial econometrics, stakeholder analysis and qualitative methodologies in the evaluation of rural development policy. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 17(2) (2015): 1550023.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-18-17-4-02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603