Study Quality Criteria and their Implementation in Terms of Master’s Degree Students

Jolita Dudaitė


The purpose of the research analysed in the article is to set study quality criteria and estimate their implementation at university in terms of master’s degree students. Research methods include analysis of literature and documents and a written questionnaire survey. Empirical research is a quantitative research, whereas pilot research is a qualitative research. The results of the pilot research showed which specific criteria for the quality of studies of the master’s degree students considered important. Based on these data, a questionnaire was prepared. When filling in the questionnaire, students had to provide their estimation how important certain criteria were to them personally and how they were implemented in their studies. Master’s degree students of the Social Technologies Faculty of Mykolas Romeris University (MRU) participated in the survey. The results of the survey showed that in terms of quality criteria the following aspects were considered important by the MRU students: study results, study process, traits of a teacher and educational environment. The results revealed that at the university the fulfilment of the major part of quality criteria is even higher than the importance given to those criteria by the students themselves. However, students give more attention to the practical (related to the professional activity) side of the studies than the university, as an institution providing education and not profession, could. Master’s degree students’ expectations related to the studies and estimation of the quality of the studies do not depend on the form of study and study fees, but partly depend on the division.


higher education; study quality criteria; master’s degree students

Full Text:

PDF (Lietuvių)


Akareem, H.S. ir Hossain, S.S. (2012). Perception of education quality in private universities of Bangladesh: a study from students' perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(1), p.11-33.

Aukštojo mokslo ministrų konferencijos komunikatas, Berlynas, 2003 m. rugsėjo 19 d., prieiga:, [žiūrėta: 2014 01 20].

Douglas, J.A., Douglas, A., McClelland , R.J., Davies, J. (2014). Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: An interpretive study in the UK Higher Education Context. Studies in Higher Education, prieiga:, [žiūrėta: 2014 01 20].

Douglas, J.A., McClelland, R.J., Davies, J. (2008). The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), p.19-35.

Grundey, D. (2008). TQM in university studies: Quality assessment and quality assurance in a Lithuanian University. Transformations in Business & Economics, 7(2), p.216-235.

Hill, Y., Lomas L., MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), p.15-20.

Joseph, M. ir Joseph, B. (1997). Service quality in education: a student perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), p.15-21.

Katiliūtė, E. , Kazlauskienė, I. (2010). The Model of Studies Quality Dimensions from Student‘s Perception. Ekonomika ir vadyba, 15, p.580-586.

Lagrosen, S., Seyyed-Hashemi, R., Leitner, M. (2004). Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(2), p.61-69.

Lietuvos respublikos mokslo ir studijų įstatymas, 2009 m. balandžio 30 d. Nr. XI-242, prieiga: [žiūrėta: 2014 01 20].

Little, B., ir Williams, R. (2010). Students’ Roles in Maintaining Quality and in Enhancing Learning: Is There a Tension? Quality in Higher Education, 16 (2), p.115-127.

Lomas, L. (2007). Are Students Customers? Perceptions of Academic Staff. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), p.31-44.

Oldfield, B. M., ir Baron, S. (2000). Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(2), p.85–95.

Owlia, M.S. ir Aspinwall E. M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 4(2), p.12-20.

Pukelytė, R. (2010). Universitetinių studijų kaip paslaugos kokybės vertinimas: dimensijos ir kriterijai. Aukštojo mokslo kokybė, 7, p.155-175.

Tjeldvoll, A. (2004). Universities‘ Quality Development under Globalisation: Key Concepts. In A. Tjeldvoll, F. Zhou. (Eds.). University Development and Globalisation, No 21. Trondheim: NTNU.

Williams, J. (2002). Student Satisfaction: a British model of effective use of student feedback in quality assurance and enhancement. 14th International Conference on Assessment and Quality in Higher Education Vienna, July, prieiga:, [žiūrėta: 2014 01 20].



  • There are currently no refbacks.

"Social Work" ISSN online 2029-2775 / ISSN print 1648-4789