There are both remarkable differences as well
as striking similarities in prison life within the European countries.
Political, cultural and socio-economical conditions may not only
influence the high (and in most European states rising) number
of prisoners but also the practices in dealing with a growing prison
population and in implementing rehabilitation as a progressive
goal of imprisonment. A systemic approach of prison life focuses
on different levels that interact in affecting the opportunity
for rehabilitation of prisoners: the structural component of the
organisation, experiences and living conditions of inmates, and
the cognitive concepts and job performance of prison staff.
During the last decade, ideas of “healthy
prisons” (based on the WHO Ottawa-Charter for Health Promotion
in 1986), theories on “social climate” in prisons as
well as resource-orientated treatment and empowerment of inmates
have been discussed as having an impact on the well-being and rehabilitation
of prisoners. Central protective factors in the prison climate
are respect, personal safety, opportunities of self-improvement
and of contacts (with the outside world). Concerning one important
risk factor, the latest findings suggest a close connection between
high vulnerability (with depressive symptoms, perceived exclusion
and low position) and the risk of exposure to severe victimisation.
Hence, the prison environment affects perceptions of self and others,
of integration or isolation, and of coping styles. The important
role of prison staff in treatment and rehabilitation is addressed
with a special focus on cognitive concepts of prison officers regarding
their professional orientation, personal goal setting and the impact
of core job characteristics. It is now widely accepted that these
constructs have significant consequences not only for job satisfaction
but also for job performance, especially the way of treating prisoners – if
they are empowered or just locked away. Still, an important ratio
of prison officers has a rather punitive orientation combined with
low job motivation. Besides individual, age- and gender-related
factors, job characteristics are not unimportant in framing a satisfying
environment. If somebody has to be imprisoned (as ultima ratio)
his or her developmental chances should be improved by carefully
selected and well trained prison officers, which in turn need a
work environment that offers motivating job characteristics.
The arguments will be underlined by results from
two new projects studying male and female imprisonment across several
European countries.